She walked into my office a few years ago, fresh MBA, ready to change the world.
Smart. Driven. Zero experience leading anything that mattered.
I gave her a supplier negotiation. âŹ2.3M at stake. Strategic component. Sheâd never led a negotiation before.
She was terrified. I was betting on her.
Two weeks of prep. Role-playing scenarios. Reviewing strategy. Then I sent her in. Alone.
She called me halfway through. Panicking. Supplier was pushing back hard. She didnât know what to do.
I said: âWhat do you think you should do?â
Long pause.
âI think I should⌠walk away. Come back tomorrow with better data.â
âThen do that.â
She did. Next day, she closed the deal. âŹ340K better than target.
Today she runs procurement for a major European manufacturer, managing a team of 30 and leading negotiations at the highest level.
Thatâs the job: not managing tasks, but building people capable of surpassing you.
Why Most Managers Donât Build Leaders
Theyâre stuck managing tasks.
Emails. Approvals. Status updates. Firefighting. The urgent drowning out the important.
Building leaders takes time. Tasks are immediate. Guess which wins?
The âtask managerâ trap:
You have two choices every day.
Option A: Do the work yourself. Itâs faster. You know itâll be done right. No risk.
Option B: Let someone else do it. Theyâll be slower. Theyâll make mistakes. Youâll have to fix things.
Option A always feels more efficient.
But Option A doesnât scale. You become the bottleneck. Your team never grows. Youâre stuck doing the same work forever.
Option B is investment. Short-term pain. Long-term leverage.
Most managers pick Option A. Then wonder why theyâre overwhelmed and their team is dependent.
Why urgent crowds out important:
Leadership development is important. Never urgent.
That report? Urgent. Training your replacement? Important.
That meeting? Urgent. Coaching someone through a tough decision? Important.
That crisis? Urgent. Developing your successor? Important.
Urgent always wins. Until you realize youâve spent five years managing tasks and built nothing that lasts.
The career cost:
To you: You donât get promoted. Why would they promote you? Nobody can do your job if you leave. Youâre too valuable where you are.
To your team: They donât grow. They become order-takers. Execute tasks. Never learn to lead. Eventually they leave for opportunities to actually develop.
The leadership legacy ROI:
Think about the best manager you ever had.
What did they teach you? How did they develop you? What opportunities did they give you that changed your trajectory?
Thatâs legacy.
Not the projects you completed. Not the deals you closed. The people you built.
Your impact as a leader is measured by what happens after you leave the room. After you leave the company. After youâre gone.
Did you build leaders who build leaders?
Thatâs the only question that matters.
The 5-Phase Framework
Hereâs how you actually do it.
Phase 1: Exposure (Months 1-6)
What it is:
Exposing high-potential people to leadership challenges before theyâre âready.â
Not giving them leadership roles. Giving them leadership exposure.
How it works:
Strategic project assignments that stretch them. Meeting shadowing where they see how decisions get made. Situations where they observe leadership in action.
Real example:
Junior analyst on my team. Brilliant with data. Zero executive presence.
I brought her to executive steering committee. Didnât ask her to present. Asked her to observe.
After three meetings, I asked: âWhat did you notice about how decisions get made?â
She said: âThe data doesnât decide. The story around the data decides. Finance presented better numbers than us last week, but we won the decision because our narrative was clearer.â
Exactly.
She learned in three meetings what took me three years to figure out.
Thatâs exposure.
The Exposure Opportunity Matrix:
| Opportunity Type | Low Risk | Medium Risk | High Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| Observation | Attend executive meetings | Shadow negotiations | Board presentations |
| Contribution | Prepare analysis for exec review | Present technical section | Present strategy recommendation |
| Ownership | Lead internal project | Lead cross-functional initiative | Lead external negotiation |
Start low-risk observation. Graduate to medium-risk contribution. Eventually high-risk ownership.
Tools you need:
Before exposing someone to a high-stakes situation, brief them:
- What to observe
- What questions to think about
- What theyâll learn from this
After, debrief:
- What did you notice?
- What surprised you?
- What would you do differently?
Exposure without reflection is just attendance. Reflection turns experience into learning.
Phase 2: Challenge (Months 7-12)
What it is:
Stretch assignments with support.
Not sink-or-swim. Swim-with-a-lifeguard-nearby.
How it works:
70-20-10 development model:
- 70% learning from challenging assignments
- 20% learning from others (coaching, mentoring, feedback)
- 10% learning from formal training
Most development happens through doing hard things. With coaching to process whatâs happening.
Real example:
First negotiation I mentioned earlier. âŹ2.3M supplier negotiation.
I didnât just throw her in. We prepared:
Week 1: She shadowed me in a negotiation. Observed. Took notes.
Week 2: She led strategy development. I coached. We role-played.
Week 3: She led the negotiation. I was available by phone. Didnât intervene.
Week 4: We debriefed. What worked. What didnât. What sheâd do differently.
She failed on three things. Succeeded on five. Net outcome: strong.
But the learning? Thatâs what mattered.
Challenge Readiness Assessment:
Before giving someone a stretch assignment, assess:
| Factor | Ready | Not Ready |
|---|---|---|
| Technical foundation | Knows the domain well enough to learn leadership | Still learning basics |
| Self-awareness | Recognizes gaps, asks for help | Doesnât know what they donât know |
| Resilience | Can handle setback without breaking | Brittle under pressure |
| Coachability | Takes feedback, adjusts quickly | Defensive when challenged |
| Intrinsic motivation | Wants to grow, not just advance | Just wants promotion |
Need at least 4 of 5 âReadyâ signals before giving stretch assignment.
The support structure:
Challenge without support is cruelty.
Before the assignment:
- Clear success criteria
- Resources theyâll need
- Who to go to for help
- Decision rights they have
During the assignment:
- Regular check-ins (weekly)
- Available for urgent questions
- Let them struggle, donât rescue immediately
After the assignment:
- Debrief what they learned
- Celebrate what worked
- Analyze what didnât
- Plan next challenge
Phase 3: Reflection (Ongoing)
What it is:
Guided processing of leadership experiences.
Experience doesnât automatically become learning. Reflection converts experience into insight.
How it works:
Structured debrief conversations after significant events.
Not âhow did it go?â But specific questions that force deeper thinking.
Real example:
After that junior analyst observed executive meetings for three months, I asked:
âYouâve seen six executive decisions now. What pattern do you notice about which proposals get approved versus which get delayed?â
She thought. Then said:
âThe ones that get approved address the CEOâs stated priorities explicitly. The ones that get delayed might be good ideas, but they donât connect to what leadership is already focused on.â
Perfect. Sheâd discovered strategic alignment through observation and reflection.
I didnât teach her that. I created conditions for her to learn it.
Reflection Question Framework:
After a challenging project:
- What did you expect to happen? What actually happened?
- Where did your plan work? Where did it fail?
- What would you do differently next time?
- What surprised you about how people responded?
- What did you learn about yourself as a leader?
After observing leadership:
- What did you notice about how decisions got made?
- What made the difference between proposals that succeeded and those that failed?
- What leadership behaviors were effective? Ineffective?
- What would you have done differently?
After receiving feedback:
- What feedback did you agree with immediately?
- What feedback surprised you?
- What patterns are you seeing across multiple peopleâs feedback?
- What one thing will you work on changing?
The reflection cadence:
Weekly: Quick check-ins on current challenges
Monthly: Deeper reflection on progress and patterns
Quarterly: Assessment of development trajectory
Reflection takes 30 minutes. The learning lasts forever.
Phase 4: Feedback (Continuous)
What it is:
Specific, actionable leadership feedback that actually helps people improve.
Not annual performance reviews. Continuous, in-the-moment coaching.
How it works:
SBI Model: Situation-Behavior-Impact
Situation: When this specific thing happenedâŚ
Behavior: Hereâs what you didâŚ
Impact: Hereâs the effect it hadâŚ
Specific. Observable. Focused on behavior, not character.
Real example:
Executive presence feedback for that same analyst:
Wrong: âYou need more executive presence.â
Vague. Unhelpful. She doesnât know what to change.
Right: âIn yesterdayâs exec meeting (Situation), when the CFO challenged your assumption, you immediately started defending your analysis and talking faster (Behavior). That made you seem defensive rather than confident. The CFO stopped engaging (Impact). Next time, try pausing, acknowledging the question, then responding calmly. That signals confidence.â
Specific. Actionable. She knows exactly what to change.
Feedback Scripts and Templates:
Positive Reinforcement:
âIn [situation], when you [behavior], it resulted in [positive impact]. Thatâs exactly the kind of [leadership quality] we need. Keep doing that.â
Example: âIn yesterdayâs supplier meeting, when they pushed back on terms, you stayed calm and asked clarifying questions instead of getting defensive. That kept the conversation productive and we reached agreement. Thatâs exactly the kind of composure needed in tough negotiations. Keep doing that.â
Developmental Feedback:
âIn [situation], when you [behavior], it resulted in [negative impact]. Hereâs what I suggest instead: [specific alternative]. Letâs practice this before your next [opportunity].â
Example: âIn yesterdayâs presentation, when you were asked about timeline, you said âIâm not sure, Iâll check.â That undermined your credibility. Hereâs what I suggest instead: âThe current estimate is X weeks, but Iâll verify the dependencies and confirm by end of day.â Gives them an answer while buying time to be precise. Letâs practice this before your next exec presentation.â
The feedback timing:
Best feedback: Within 24 hours of the behavior.
Good feedback: Within a week.
Useless feedback: Annual performance review six months later.
If you wait, theyâve already moved on. The behavior is disconnected from the feedback. Learning doesnât happen.
Give feedback when itâs fresh. When they can immediately apply it.
Phase 5: Autonomy (Year 2+)
What it is:
Graduated independence with a safety net.
Not abandonment. Strategic delegation of real decision rights.
How it works:
You stop being involved in execution. You stay involved in strategy and development.
They own outcomes. You provide context and coaching.
Real example:
After two years developing that analyst, I gave her full ownership of a category strategy.
She owned:
- Supplier selection decisions
- Contract negotiations
- Budget allocation
- Team coordination
I was available for:
- Strategic guidance
- Political navigation
- Crisis support
- Career coaching
She ran it. I coached from the sidelines.
First year, she made three significant mistakes. Each one we debriefed, learned from, adjusted.
Second year, she made one mistake.
Third year, she was teaching others how to run category strategies.
Autonomy Readiness Checklist:
Ready for autonomy when they demonstrate:
- Technical mastery: Knows the domain deeply
- Strategic thinking: Sees beyond immediate tasks to broader impact
- Stakeholder management: Builds relationships and navigates politics effectively
- Decision quality: Makes sound judgments with incomplete information
- Learning orientation: Seeks feedback, reflects on mistakes, adjusts quickly
- Resilience: Handles setbacks without falling apart
- Communication: Articulates thinking clearly up, down, and across
- Judgment: Knows when to escalate and when to handle independently
Need 7 of 8 for full autonomy. 5-6 for partial autonomy with closer oversight.
The delegation conversation:
âHereâs what you now own: [scope]
Hereâs the decision authority you have: [specific rights]
Hereâs where Iâm still involved: [strategic, not tactical]
Hereâs how weâll stay connected: [cadence]
Hereâs how Iâll support you: [availability]
Hereâs what success looks like: [outcomes]
Questions?â
Clear boundaries. Clear expectations. Clear support.
Then let go.
The Development Conversation Framework
Leadership development doesnât happen in formal reviews. It happens in regular, meaningful conversations.
The quarterly development conversation:
Not performance review. Development discussion.
The structure:
1. Reflection on progress (15 minutes)
âWhat are you most proud of from the last quarter?â
âWhat was harder than expected?â
âWhat did you learn about yourself as a leader?â
Let them talk. Listen more than you speak.
2. Feedback exchange (15 minutes)
âHereâs what Iâve observedâŚâ (Use SBI model)
âWhat feedback do you have for me on how I can better support your development?â
Two-way. Not just you evaluating them.
3. Development priorities (20 minutes)
âBased on where you want to go, what are the 2-3 capabilities you most need to develop?â
âWhat opportunities could help you build those?â
âWhat support do you need from me?â
Let them drive. You facilitate.
4. Goal setting (10 minutes)
âLetâs define specific development goals for next quarter.â
Make them SMART:
- Specific: âLead cross-functional projectâ not âimprove leadershipâ
- Measurable: âPresent to exec team twiceâ not âget more visibilityâ
- Achievable: Stretch but realistic
- Relevant: Aligned to their career trajectory
- Time-bound: Specific timeline
Individual Development Plan Template:
| Development Goal | Target Capability | Learning Activities | Success Measures | Support Needed | Timeline |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lead first supplier negotiation | Strategic negotiation | Shadow 2 negotiations, role-play prep, lead âŹ500K negotiation | Close deal within 10% of target, positive supplier feedback | Weekly coaching sessions, backup support during negotiation | Q2 2026 |
| Build executive presence | Executive communication | Present at 2 exec meetings, complete presentation course, get feedback from 3 execs | Positive feedback from execs, no nervous tells, clear messaging | Presentation coaching, exec meeting access | Q1-Q2 2026 |
| Develop strategic thinking | Systems thinking | Lead category strategy refresh, read 2 strategy books, discuss with mentor monthly | Strategy approval from leadership, identification of 3 non-obvious opportunities | Strategic planning templates, monthly strategy discussions | Q1-Q3 2026 |
Tracking progress without micromanaging:
Monthly check-in (30 minutes):
- Progress on development goals
- Obstacles encountered
- Support needed
- Adjustments to plan
Youâre not tracking tasks. Youâre enabling growth.
Question frameworks that unlock insight:
Instead of: âHowâs it going?â
Ask: âWhatâs the hardest decision youâve faced this month? Walk me through your thinking.â
Instead of: âAny issues?â
Ask: âWhere are you stuck? What would unstick you?â
Instead of: âYou shouldâŚâ
Ask: âWhat have you considered? Whatâs holding you back from that approach?â
Questions that make them think develop capability. Answers you provide create dependency.
Common Mistakes That Derail Development
Mistake 1: Delegating Tasks, Not Leadership Opportunities
The trap:
You delegate execution. Not decision-making.
âHereâs what I need you to doâ vs. âHereâs the outcome we need, how would you approach it?â
One creates order-takers. The other creates leaders.
The fix:
Delegate outcomes, not tasks. Let them figure out the how.
Mistake 2: Rescuing Too Quickly When They Struggle
The trap:
Theyâre struggling. You jump in. Fix it. They never learn.
Your job isnât preventing failure. Itâs ensuring failure becomes learning.
The fix:
Let them struggle longer than feels comfortable. Ask âWhat have you tried?â before offering solutions.
Rescue only when:
- Actual crisis (not just discomfort)
- Risk to customer/company
- Theyâve exhausted their own problem-solving
Otherwise, coach through it. Donât solve for them.
Mistake 3: Only Developing People Who Remind You of Yourself
The trap:
You unconsciously invest in people who think like you, look like you, have similar backgrounds.
You miss talent thatâs different from you.
The fix:
Deliberately develop people who are nothing like you. Different backgrounds. Different strengths. Different styles.
Diversity of thought makes better leaders. Homogeneity makes weaker teams.
Mistake 4: Not Investing Time Because They Might Leave
The trap:
âWhy develop them if theyâll just leave for another company?â
This is backwards thinking.
The fix:
Better question: âWhat happens if we donât develop them and they stay?â
You get stuck with people who canât grow. Who become dead weight. Who block advancement for others.
Develop them. If they stay, you have great leaders. If they leave, you have a reputation for building talent and stronger people want to work for you.
Either way, you win.
Mistake 5: Confusing Subject Matter Expertise with Leadership Potential
The trap:
Best engineer becomes engineering manager. Best analyst becomes team lead.
Technical excellence doesnât predict leadership capability.
The fix:
Assess leadership potential separately from technical skill:
- Do they influence without authority?
- Do they make others better?
- Do they think strategically, not just tactically?
- Do they take ownership beyond their role?
- Do they develop others?
Technical mastery is necessary. Not sufficient.
Your job isnât managing work.
Itâs building people who can do work you canât imagine yet.
Tasks get done today. Leaders compound for decades.
That analyst I developed? Sheâs now developing leaders who are developing leaders.
Thatâs three generations of impact from one investment.
Thatâs legacy.
Start with one person. Give them exposure. Challenge them. Reflect with them. Give feedback. Grant autonomy.
Repeat.
In five years, youâll have built something that outlasts you.
Thatâs the work.